life should mean life,

[silkcityuk2]

how can you now agree when before it was death to all..you are worse than a labour mp ..changing to suit the reaction..a man should stick to ther original statement not wriggle when under cross examination . if of course there had been one iota of fact in it...simon you are weakening in the face of superior minds..

aint it about time you learned how to read?
show me where i said death to all
superior mind , spits tea all over the screen
you do need to get on xfactor you are so funny
complete twat but bloody funny

[PATRIOT73]

well thats easy heres is a picture of a troll..do you simon look like it

quite the gentlemen eh..........wud nt u agree mickey:

[silkcityuk2]

simon is this picture more fitting for you

hey thats me such a looker aint i

[silkcityuk2]

simon is this picture more fitting for you

ohh minnie
at least the cap fits
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=minnie

[PATRIOT73]

hey thats me such a looker aint i

oooooooooooooo wat big eyes u ave:

[silkcityuk2]

here it is unless it has a different meening....i agree with the death penalty ..seems pretty convincing to me you said it simon DEATH

read it you fool
only if its 100% convicted murderers

[silkcityuk2]

WHAT HAPPENS AFTER YOU HAVE MURDERED THEM AND THEY GOT THE WRONG PERSON...PERHAPS THEY SHOULD FREEZE THEM AND BRING THEM BACK WHEN THE RIGHT PERSON GETS CAUGHT...AS A UNIVERSITY GRAUATE AND AN ARTICLED CLERK FOR SOME YEARS IN A LEADING LAW FIRM. I NO ONLY TO WELL THIS LAW SYSTEM..

then you really are a suckker

100% sure means exactly that
if they are only 99% then they get locked up for life

[leadhillsonline]

though i agree with some of what you have said
why should a convicted murderer have any rights?
they took away the life of another
going to prison is just a badge for a lot of young offenders and something to brag about
the punishment must fit the crime

By opposing capital punishment, that by inference implies a right to life - however ill-deserved. Also any convict who does not have the right to change can never be integrated properly into society and will always remain a burden, this right is inherant in the efforts of prison officers, educators, the probation service and others to rehabilitate offenders.

Violent young offenders faced with indefinite sentancing (Her Majesty's Pleasure) will have a very rude awkening and no amount of bragging will help when their "friends" desert them in droves for fear of a similar fate. But for such a strategy to work, it must be very well documented and publicised. Furthermore, great effort must be expended on identifying at an early age, those most likely to behave violently and pressing the message home along with promoting and encouraging alternatives to violence - civilisation don't come cheap.

As for punishment, this ia a concept that is lost on many inmates, the "bagde" of credibility. Prison serves no purpose as punishment nor should it. We imprison people to protect society and should not pander to the idea that criminals are in some way martyrs or heroes. The message is simple - they are removed from society and will remain so until they grow up and learn how to behave in a civilised fashion. It makes my skin crawl when an immature, obnoxious, selfish tike is labled a "dangerous" and/or "professional criminal". Let the courts describe them accurately.

I'll bet the Krays would have loved being told their evil crimes were the actions of pathetic, ignorant mummy's boys, lacking the brain-power and sense of responsibility to make a positive contribution to society.

The reason these sad people get the credibility is because Politicians, the Courts, the Police and half of Joe-public give it to them.

[silkcityuk2]

By opposing capital punishment, that by inference implies a right to life - however ill-deserved. Also any convict who does not have the right to change can never be integrated properly into society and will always remain a burden, this right is inherant in the efforts of prison officers, educators, the probation service and others to rehabilitate offenders.

Violent young offenders faced with indefinite sentancing (Her Majesty's Pleasure) will have a very rude awkening and no amount of bragging will help when their "friends" desert them in droves for fear of a similar fate. But for such a strategy to work, it must be very well documented and publicised. Furthermore, great effort must be expended on identifying at an early age, those most likely to behave violently and pressing the message home along with promoting and encouraging alternatives to violence - civilisation don't come cheap.

As for punishment, this ia a concept that is lost on many inmates, the "bagde" of credibility. Prison serves no purpose as punishment nor should it. We imprison people to protect society and should not pander to the idea that criminals are in some way martyrs or heroes. The message is simple - they are removed from society and will remain so until they grow up and learn how to behave in a civilised fashion. It makes my skin crawl when an immature, obnoxious, selfish tike is labled a "dangerous" and/or "professional criminal". Let the courts describe them accurately.

I'll bet the Krays would have loved being told their evil crimes were the actions of pathetic, ignorant mummy's boys, lacking the brain-power and sense of responsibility to make a positive contribution to society.

The reason these sad people get the credibility is because Politicians, the Courts, the Police and half of Joe-public give it to them.

but what about the innocent life of the victim
do they not deserve there killers to be punished?
i have said before
if the young offenders knew it would not be a easy ride and nothing to brag about half of them would think twice
but sadly i cannot see anything changing in the near future

[hypn0t0ad]

life should mean life for all convicted murderers ,make them die in prison no release whatsoever

Fair enough. That'll cost money....are you happy to pay an extra 2-5p in the £ tax to see that happen? How else should we pay for it?

i agree with death penalty if the facts show 100% guilty

No evidence on earth will ever show 100% guilt - even forensic evidence has odds against it.