Unbelievable waste : (

[clockmad]

What do you think?
YouTube - Join The Fish Fight: www.fishfight.net

If you agree you might want to support the campaign to stop it. Hugh's Fish Fight - Half of all fish caught in the North Sea is thrown back overboard dead






Graham

[astral276]

It's called 'conservation'.

Making them throw them back stops them fishing for the immature fish or threatened species in the first place - at least that is the theory.

[clockmad]

It's called 'conservation'.

Making them throw them back stops them fishing for the immature fish or threatened species in the first place - at least that is the theory.

Sorry, but that's a rubbish theory !!!

[Pink_Panther]

Attachment 20745 You can't conserve dead fish?

[Pink_Panther]

New Zealand I believe has no take zones that are relocated every five years.
It's a method that really works to conserve fish stocks!

[PATRIOT73]

It's called 'conservation'.

Making them throw them back stops them fishing for the immature fish or threatened species in the first place - at least that is the theory.

thats cr@p
wats conservation in throowing tons o dead fish away.........they micraculously spring to life

[PATRIOT73]

go huw

[billsstamps]

The scandal is not the waste, but that fish are being caught which should not be caught.

It is cheaper for fishermen to catch all than to catch selectively, but in the end they suffer because they are depleting the stock which will give them their future livelihood.

[PATRIOT73]

The scandal is not the waste, but that fish are being caught which should not be caught.

It is cheaper for fishermen to catch all than to catch selectively, but in the end they suffer because they are depleting the stock which will give them their future livelihood.

wat shud they do then
stik sign on net
no cod thankyou
simply limit fishin hours,keeep wat u catch
not silli qoutas..............sorted

[Pink_Panther]

The scandal is not the waste, but that fish are being caught which should not be caught.

It is cheaper for fishermen to catch all than to catch selectively, but in the end they suffer because they are depleting the stock which will give them their future livelihood.

That's why New Zealand have taken a different tack.

In 50 mile long no take zones All marine life is undisturbed for five years. Imagine that around GB every other 50 miles of coastline a no take zone for 5 years!

Fishermen fishing in the take zones could land all they catch. Fish in no take zones have a good chance to grow to maturity. The no take zones will also maintain a healthy stock in the take zones as fish move out to less crowded waters.