Cheaper Than eBay
Vintage Fas Sterling Silver 925 Locket Pendant Necklace (42)
Cheaper Than eBay
Vintage Fas Sterling Silver 925 Locket Pendant Necklace (42)
Cheaper Than eBay
Vintage Fas Sterling Silver 925 Locket Pendant Necklace (42)
Cheaper Than eBay
Vintage Fas Sterling Silver 925 Locket Pendant Necklace (42)

Vintage Fas Sterling Silver 925 Locket Pendant Necklace (42)

$12.59
Ship to United States : calculate
Total : $12.59
Ask Question
Notice from Seller : on vacation till sept 1
  • Condition : Used
  • Dispatch : Next Day
  • Brand : FAS
  • ID# : 227245355
  • Barcode : None
  • Start : Sun 02 Feb 2025 11:54:19 (EDT)
  • Close : Run Until Sold
  • Remain :
    Run Until Sold
postrander1 accepts payment via PayPal

Shipping Calculator



Seller's Description

This vintage Fas locket pendant necklace is a treasure to behold. Crafted from high-quality sterling silver, this piece is both durable and elegant. The locket design adds a touch of nostalgia and charm to any outfit, while the intricate pendant detailing makes it a one-of-a-kind piece. Whether you're a collector of fine jewelry or simply looking for a unique accessory to add to your collection, this necklace is sure to impress. The 925 metal purity ensures quality and longevity, while the unknown main stone adds an element of mystery and intrigue. Upgrade your jewelry game with this vintage Fas locket pendant necklace.

Listing Information

Listing TypeGallery Listing
Listing ID#227245355
Start TimeSun 02 Feb 2025 11:54:19 (EDT)
Close TimeRun Until Sold
Starting BidFixed Price (no bidding)
Item ConditionUsed
Bids0
Views17
Dispatch TimeNext Day
Quantity1
LocationUnited States
Auto ExtendNo

Seller Recent Feedback

Returns Policy

Returns Accepted

Refund Type: Money Back
Shipping Cost Paid by: Buyer
Returns Within: 30 Days

Purchase Activity

Username Time & Date Amount
No Bids as of Yet
This is a single item listing. If an auction is running, the winning bidder will be the highest bidder.

Questions and Answers

No Questions Asked About This Listing Yet
I understand the Q&A policies