Hi Gazza and Mark,
I'm concerned that the ability to remove an undesirable bidder from an auction is being misused. Buyers are bidding on auctions in good faith, but (if the forum advice has been taking place) some are having their bids removed by being 'blackballed'. I understand why people have been giving this advice, ( seller makes mistake in listing, item sold elsewhere etc..) However i really don't agree that the way to resolve a sellers mistake is to blackball the buyer. If I were a new buyer on EBID and had placed a bid in good faith; only to find my bid remobved or the auction had disappeared. I would not be at all impressed with ebid.![]()
In my view sellers who make genuine mistakes with their auction listings should contact EBID support to explain the position. support would then decide if it is appropriate to make the auction null and void, and issue an explaintary email to the bidder.
Where a seller sells an item elsewhere- the seller should apologise to the bidder and accept that they may get negative feedback ( It's a risk any of us take if we list in two places. if you don't accept the risk- don't double list!)
I wouldn't like to see the blackball facility removed - i think it's important a seller can choose who not to sell to ( before they bid ) and I know the system is very useful when sellers have malicious bidders posting all kinds of 'questions' on their auctions. However I would like to see guidance published on what are appropriate reasons to blackball a bidder; and I think it would help if sellers had to give a 'reason' for blackballing someone who is already bidding on their auctions, and that a copy of the reason is sent to EBID admin at the same time the blackball is set. This would enable EBID to monitor the system for abuse