The EU Referendum.

[PATRIOT73]

so dodgy dave &co aint scaremongering then
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...sborne-of-lud/

[buttons-and-bows]

I think this is getting to the stage now where people will just say sod it I won't waste my time voting with all the slagging off of each other and all the lies being flung about.

[astral276]

so dodgy dave &co aint scaremongering then
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...sborne-of-lud/

Sadly, hardly a balanced article. If you want to balance it out by reading something biased to the other extreme then read something like the Independent.

[astral276]

I think this is getting to the stage now where people will just say sod it I won't waste my time voting with all the slagging off of each other and all the lies being flung about.

I would think, in the absence of any real information, the majority who do vote will do so using their hearts rather than their heads. The whole campaign has been a total disgrace. Though with our politicians that was probably to be expected.

[tony41]

Just received the latest "unbiased" leaflet from Bonkers Boris and pals. Not worth the paper it's printed on.

[astral276]

Just received the latest "unbiased" leaflet from Bonkers Boris and pals. Not worth the paper it's printed on.

Of course it is biased, just as the Remain camp's output is biased. Neither side is going to make the other side's case for them.

[sidthelamp]

looks to me , the word biased is being just a tad over used,another example of being lazy, any one with a point of view is going to give there point of view you might not agree with it, you might not like it, but you do have the ability to counter argue with your own point of view, what you might call biased gives you a opportunity to counter argue, which could its self be deemed biased by the parties who you are counter arguing with,

i havent come across anywhere any lies from the remain camp or the leave camp, its often whats not said is more important than whats said,you all have the opportunity to find out whats not said and counter argue, continually calling something biased without a counter argument is hollow, lazy, worthless.

[sidthelamp]

so dodgy dave &co aint scaremongering then
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...sborne-of-lud/

i find that article fairly well balanced, with information both camps have used, it has opinions that i agree with, and in part is a counter argument , with what is important , what it is arguing for , and against,

[PATRIOT73]

Sadly, hardly a balanced article. If you want to balance it out by reading something biased to the other extreme then read something like the Independent.

hes atuva article


http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...orne-tax-rises

ozzies brexit threat

[olivia8143]

Maybe this thread should be closed for the weekend (following the political parties example) as a mark of respect for Jo Cox

https://www.gofundme.com/jocox