your defending a negative argument Damian
the proposal is only going one way its whole point is to circumnavagate the existing safe guards so they have live acsess to all ISPs phone companys all communication systems if you had taken the time to read the CCDP document it explains every thing there trying to do how the ministers are hoodwinking the MPs the isp providers have said in the document it will cost billions to implement and its brobably illegal because the incripted codes for on line banking will be broken and read by the systems black box the ccdp document not only confirms my fears of what there trying to do the author states its a rehash of the 2006/2009 white paper put before parliment that were thrown out .
privacy international director has said its the biggest threat to civil liberties in the last five years and you respond with this.
HE might be in a position to know. YOU, I and the vast majority of the population are not. However, once again, the full details of the proposal HAVE NOT BEEN PUBLISHED so we don't know what is in them. Once the information is available it will be time to decide.
he is in a position to know he could not of said what he has said otherwise the full details may not be available on mass but they are available to people i have quoted from they confirm every thing i have said if you take the time to read the CCDP document it says the proposal will circumnavigate the existing safeguards thats the whole point Damian any safe guards will be bypassed, you can sit on the fence all you like deni the concerns of every one who i have quoted deni the facts of the proposals that are available.
a good analogy Damian would be a apathetic person sitting on a railway track surrounded by sheep telling him to move because its dangerous the apathetic person replied IM NOT MOVING TILL I GET THE TIME TABLE ITS PERFECTLEY SAFE of course by the time the time table was published the apathetic person was no longer in a position to read it.