How come the AV referendum is being run on a 'First Past The Post' basis?
yes
no
more important issues to deal wiv
How come the AV referendum is being run on a 'First Past The Post' basis?
I voted "yes"
Say a candidate gets 40% of the vote,
that means 60% of the voters or the majority don't want that candidate.
Therefore first past the post is wrong.
When did speaking ones mind in a so called democracy become a rant? More media influenced jargon.
Well I agree, THIS is an issue that needs dealing with, its like an out of control de-railed train. Also Im fed up of self-seeking politicians and politics and their condescending, narrow minded attitoodes. Power hungry, over paid but above all completely forgetting it is they who are supposed to be serving US and paid by US and NOT the other way round. The same goes for councils, their arrogance and self appointed rights they have to answer to no one need a complete shake-up.
THIS is not what democracy is about. Once it gets its house in order, then I may think about voting, when I can trust them to even HAVE my vote.
Its a no from me
Reincarnation is just another repeat
I think the only thing for a reasonable person to do is to vote YES
Those who only want one vote, still get one vote with AV.
Those who vote NO are depriving those who want to vote YES of their preference, when voting either way does not affect them.
The reason I want AV is because it gives me more ability to keep someone I don't like, OUT. That is no wasted vote means.
Rev Dr Bill Hopkinson,
Retired professor
BillsStamps
around 50000 stamps listed, based in London
well i put no but only because I was told by hubby we should vote no, I don't really understand what's going on........Thicko you see
... there is also the tremendous amount of money involved in doing a second count, a third count or even a fourth count....
--Linda--
all feedback from eBid
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)