YDC auction limit count for each participant

[cornishmaid1961]

As I've already said, I think the rules are already too complicated, so no argument from me - I was just clarifying on the *purpose* of the rules as I understand it, which would mean Rainy would *not* be put in the uncomfortable position of having to reject listings as you feared.

But if a rule is continually broken should something not be mentioned by whoever is in charge of the YDC ? I thought that is why the rules were developed for the YDC to stop unfair prices etc ? Any unscrupulous seller could come along and use the YDC title if nothing is said.

That is why I had it in mind that adding yet another rule would maybe put an added burden on Sarah. Not to mention that she would have to figure out who has put on the right amount of listings to find a winner !

[meebo1]

I haven't voted yet...
but as a buyer if there are fewer auctions, I can afford to spend more on individual items. I know from experience (a very early one, now I am not worried) that it can be disappointing if an item doesn't get any bids on.
I may go for a limit of 10, but am still thinking

[bykimbo]

But if a rule is continually broken should something not be mentioned by whoever is in charge of the YDC ? I thought that is why the rules were developed for the YDC to stop unfair prices etc ? Any unscrupulous seller could come along and use the YDC title if nothing is said.

That is why I had it in mind that adding yet another rule would maybe put an added burden on Sarah. Not to mention that she would have to figure out who has put on the right amount of listings to find a winner !

Oh, I'm sure somebody will point it out to her if she gets it wrong.